jump to navigation

Tax Tip of the Week | Can S Corporations Save Taxes? Apparently, Some Politicians Think So. August 21, 2019

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : Business consulting, Deductions, Depreciation options, General, tax changes, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Preparation, Tax Tip, Taxes , add a comment

In an effort to save federal income taxes, many people and not just some politicians route their business income through S corporations.  Their profits which may be retained by the S corporation and/or distributed to the shareholder(s) are typically the result of keeping the shareholder’s reasonable wages at a level that assures a corporate profit.  Keeping these reasonable wages below the FICA ceiling ($132,900 for 2019) may save taxes of 15.3% from FICA and Medicare, combined.  If, these wages exceed the FICA ceiling then the potential tax savings drop to only the Medicare tax of 2.9% plus another .9% if individual’s wages are over $200,000 ($250,000 married filing jointly).

The point to be made here is that at the right income levels, significant tax savings may exist with the proper use of an S corporation.  However, these savings come along with the possibility of additional IRS scrutiny.  And, since you may be paying less social security taxes, your future social security benefits may be dinged ever so slightly; but these tax savings are now in your own pocket.

The below WSJ article authored by Richard Rubin covers a portion of this age-old tax saving strategy along with some interesting commentary.

               -Mark Bradstreet

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden used a tax loophole that the Obama administration tried and failed to close, substantially lowering his tax bill.

Mr. Biden and his wife, Dr. Jill Biden, routed their book and speech income through S corporations, according to tax returns the couple released this week. They paid income taxes on those profits, but the strategy let the couple avoid the 3.8% net investment income tax they would have paid had they been compensated directly instead of through the S corporations.

The tax savings were as much as $500,000, compared to what the Biden’s would have owed if paid directly or if the Obama proposal had become law.

“As demonstrated by their effective federal tax rate in 2017 and 2018—which exceeded 33%—the Biden’s are committed to ensuring that all Americans pay their fair share,” the Biden campaign said in a statement Wednesday.

The technique is known in tax circles as the Gingrich-Edwards loophole—for former presidential candidates Newt Gingrich, a Republican, and John Edwards, a Democrat—whose tax strategies were scrutinized and drew calls for policy changes years ago. Other prominent politicians, including former President Barack Obama and fellow Democrat Hillary Clinton, as well as current contenders for the 2020 Democratic nomination Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, received their book or speech income differently and paid self-employment taxes.

Some tax experts have pointed to pieces of President Trump’s financial disclosures and leaked tax returns to suggest that he has used a similar tax-avoidance strategy.

Unlike his Democratic rivals and predecessors in both parties, Mr. Trump has refused to release his tax returns, and his administration is fighting House Democrats’ attempt to use their statutory authority to obtain them. Democratic presidential candidates have released their tax returns and welcomed criticism to draw a contrast with Mr. Trump.

“There’s no reason for these to be in an S corp—none, other than to save on self-employment tax,” said Tony Nitti, an accountant at RubinBrown LLP who reviewed the returns.

Mr. Biden, who was vice president from 2009 to 2017, has led the Democratic field in polls since entering the race. He is campaigning on making high-income Americans pay more in taxes and on closing tax loopholes that benefit the wealthy.

Mr. Biden has decried the proliferation of such loopholes since Ronald Reagan’s presidency and said the tax revenue could be used, in part, to help pay for initiatives to provide free community-college tuition or to fight climate change.

“We don’t have to punish anybody, including the rich. But everybody should start paying their fair share a little bit. When I’m president, we’re going to have a fairer tax code,” Mr. Biden said last month during a speech in Davenport, Iowa.

The U.S. imposes a 3.8% tax on high-income households—defined as individuals making above $200,000 and married couples making above $250,000. Wage earners have part of the tax taken out of their paychecks and pay part of it on their returns. Self-employed business owners have to pay it, too. People with investment earnings pay a 3.8% tax as well.

But people with profits from their active involvement in businesses can declare those earnings to be neither compensation nor investment income. The Obama administration proposed closing that gap by requiring all such income to be subject to a 3.8% tax, and it was the largest item on a list of “loophole closers” in a plan Mr. Obama released during his last year in office. The administration estimated that proposal, which didn’t advance in Congress, would have raised $272 billion from 2017 through 2026.

Under current law, S-corporation owners can legally avoid paying the 3.8% tax on their profits as long as they pay themselves “reasonable compensation” that is subject to regular payroll taxes. S corporations are a commonly used form for closely held businesses in which the profits flow through to the owners’ individual tax returns and are taxed there instead of at the business level.

The difficulty is in defining reasonable compensation, and the IRS has had mixed success in challenging business owners on the issue. The Bidens’ S corporations—CelticCapri Corp. and Giacoppa Corp.—reported more than $13 million in combined profits in 2017 and 2018 that weren’t subject to the self-employment tax, while those companies paid them less than $800,000 in salary.

If the entire amount were considered compensation, the Bidens could owe about $500,000. An IRS inquiry might reach a conclusion somewhat short of that.

“The salaries earned by the Bidens are reasonable and were determined in good faith, considering the nature of the entities and the services they performed,” the Biden campaign statement said.

For businesses that generate money from capital investments or from a large workforce, less of the profits stem from the owner’s work, and thus reasonable compensation can be lower. For businesses whose profits are largely attributable to the owner’s work, the case for reasonable compensation that is far below profits is harder to make.

To the extent that the Bidens’ profits came directly from the couple’s consulting and public speaking, “to treat those as other than compensation is pretty aggressive,” said Steve Rosenthal, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center, a research group run by a former Obama administration official.

Mr. Nitti said he uses a “call in sick” rule for his clients trying to navigate the reasonable-compensation question: If the owner called in sick, how much money could the company still make?

“The reasonable comp standard is a nebulous one,” Mr. Nitti said. “This is pretty cut and dried. If you’re speaking or writing a book, it’s all attributable to your efforts.”

The IRS puts more energy into cases where the business owners pay so little reasonable compensation that they owe the full Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes of 15.3%, Mr. Nitti said.

In a statement released Tuesday along with the candidate’s tax returns, the Biden campaign noted that the couple employs others through its S corporation and calls the companies a “common method for taxpayers who have outside sources of income to consolidate their earnings and expenses.”

Credit given to: Richard Rubin. This article was written July 10, 2019. You can write to Richard Rubin at richard.rubin@wsj.com—Ken Thomas contributed to this article.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We also welcome and appreciate anyone who wishes to write a Tax Tip of the Week for our consideration. We may be reached in our Dayton office at 937-436-3133 or in our Xenia office at 937-372-3504. Or, visit our website.  

This week’s author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | Health Care Plans Gain More Flexibility August 14, 2019

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : General, Healthcare, tax changes, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Tip, Taxes , add a comment

On June 13, 2019, the IRS issued final regulations regarding health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs).  These types of plans were radically changed and restricted by the Affordable Care Act. The new regulations reinstate the ability of employers to use HRAs to reimburse employees who buy their own health insurance, but the rules can be fairly complicated in certain situations. The full set of rules can be found in the federal register at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/06/20/2019-12571/health-reimbursement-arrangements-and-other-account-based-group-health-plans. In pdf form (and in typical IRS fashion), this article is 140 pages long. It appears to be a collaboration between the IRS, the Employee Benefits Security Administration, the Department of Labor, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and the Department of Health and Human Services, and is titled “Health Reimbursement Arrangements and Other Account-Based Group Health Plans”. 

Following is a nice (and much smaller) article published on June 24, 2019, by Jessica Kuester of Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP, which helps explain some of the provisions of the new rules, such as who can and cannot be covered, types of HRAs, effective dates, and other features and restrictions of the new HRA regulations.

                                                   –Norman S. Hicks, CPA

Final Regulations Allow Employers to Pay For Employees’ Health Insurance Premiums

Health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) are a very flexible type of group health plan—they allow employers to reimburse employees for certain medical expenses on a pre-tax basis. Based on the IRS’s interpretation of changes in law that were enacted by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), these arrangements lost most of the flexibility that they had been able to provide for over 50 years. Although HRAs could be integrated with major medical plans offered by employers (i.e., a so-called “integrated HRA”), they could not be offered on a stand-alone basis without the employer incurring a $36,500 per year per participant excise tax. In effect, this meant that employers could no longer reimburse employees for the cost of premiums incurred when purchasing health insurance. New regulations (issued on June 13, 2019) bring back some of the flexibility of HRAs.

What is the new type of HRA?

In a so-called “individual coverage HRA,” employers can reimburse employees for medical expenses (including premiums) that they incur on a pre-tax basis. For each month that they are covered by the individual coverage HRA, employees must be covered by individual health insurance (either offered on the ACA Exchange or not), and employers must substantiate such coverage.

Who can be covered by an individual coverage HRA?

An individual coverage HRA cannot be offered to any employee offered a traditional employer-sponsored group health plan. This means that employees cannot be given a choice between the employer’s traditional group health plan and an individual coverage HRA—employers can only offer one or the other. However, employers can decide to offer an individual coverage HRA to one or more class of employees and a traditional group health plan to the other classes. The acceptable classes are full-time employees, part-time employees, seasonal employees, employees working in the same geographic location (such as the same state or same insurance rating area), collectively bargained employees, salaried employees, hourly employees and newly-hired vs. existing employees. These are only a few examples: there are other types of classes identified in the regulations and additional classes can be formed by combining any of the acceptable classes. In addition, minimum class size rules (generally, 20 class members) apply to employers offering a traditional group health plan to some classes and an Individual Coverage HRA to other classes.

How much can employers reimburse under an individual coverage HRA?

Just like with other types of HRAs, employers can reimburse as much or as little as they want. However, the individual coverage HRA must be offered on the same terms to all employees in the class. So although the amount of reimbursement can vary between classes, they generally cannot vary among the class members (except for variations based on an employee’s age or the number of dependents).

How do employers offer an individual coverage HRA?

Employers offering an individual coverage HRA must notify eligible participants about the individual coverage HRA and its interaction with the premium tax credit that is available to certain individuals under federal tax law. Although the individual coverage HRA itself is considered an employer-sponsored group health plan, the underlying health insurance coverage purchased by the employee is not, so long as the employee’s purchase of the insurance coverage is voluntary, the employer does not select or endorse any particular insurance carrier or coverage, the employer does not receive any kickbacks for an employee’s selection of any particular individual health insurance and each employee is notified annually that the individual health insurance they select is not subject to ERISA.

What about the employer mandate?

The good news: an employer’s offer of reimbursement through an individual coverage HRA counts as an offer of coverage for purposes of the ACA’s employer mandate. The bad news: although the new regulations offer guidance on when an individual coverage HRA will be considered “affordable” for purposes of the premium tax credit, the IRS has not yet issued rules describing when the coverage will be considered “affordable” for purposes of the employer mandate. These rules are likely coming soon.

Are there any other types of new HRAs available under the new regulations?

The new regulations also create an excepted benefit HRA. The excepted benefit HRA is different than the individual coverage HRA in that it only reimburses the employee for costs incurred in connection with “excepted benefits” (such as dental and vision benefits). This new excepted benefit HRA is an HRA offered as part of an employer’s traditional group health program and can reimburse medical expenses even when the employee opts out of the group health plan itself. This is a departure from the current rules that apply to integrated HRAs, which only permit reimbursement of medical expenses when the employee actually enrolls in the group health plan.

The excepted benefit HRA:

When can employers start offering these new types of HRAs?

The new types of HRAs can be offered beginning on Jan. 1, 2020. Note that, in order to start offering coverage under the individual coverage HRA on that date, employers will need to take action before then.  Most notably, the required notice must be provided prior to Jan. 1, and employees will need to take part in the 2020 open enrollment period for individual coverage, which typically occurs in late 2019.

Jessica E. Kuester is an attorney with Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP and represents employers in all of their employee benefit needs. She can be reached at jkuester@taftlaw.com. Her article, as reproduced above, can be found at https://www.taftlaw.com/news-events/law-bulletins/final-regulations-allow-employers-to-pay-for-employees-health-insurance-premiums.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We may be reached in our Dayton office at 937-436-3133 or in our Xenia office at 937-372-3504. Or, visit our website.

This Week’s Author – Norman S Hicks, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | How to Avoid being Overwhelmed in Times of Death and Illness? August 7, 2019

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : General, Healthcare, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Tip, Taxes, Uncategorized , add a comment

What do you do when one spouse refuses to be or has not been invited to be involved with finances but then an unexpected death or illness occurs?

Dealing with death and illness is a difficult time for a spouse and the family, no matter the circumstances. When the spouse is unaware of how the finances have been handled, it may lead to frozen accounts and assets. Gary Altman, an estate planning attorney in Rockville, MD., explained that it is common to find families in this situation. He recently had a client who had to ask her brother-in-law for financial assistance. Altman stated that his client did not have enough money in their joint accounts. She was unable to make ends meet because the accounts were in her husband’s name alone and the financial institutions will freeze the single-owner accounts when a person dies. 

Financial professionals and attorneys know that these times are sensitive, delicate and trying. They also have encountered many times that the surviving spouse who was hands-off has to deal with missing information and does not have complete knowledge of their net worth or where accounts are held. The surviving spouse will most likely be overwhelmed with the financial decisions while trying to cope with the day to day emotions of grief and loss. Grieving can cause a person to have high emotions, which may lead to unclear decisions. According to Susan Bradley, founder of Sudden Money Institute, grief can reduce cognitive capacity. She recommends that the surviving spouse focus on what is important or pressing during this time. For example, the survivor should pay the bills that are essential to live each day. Slowing down and realizing what is truly important throughout this time will allow prioritizing urgent matters, most importantly, dealing with emotions and getting through the day one step at a time. The surviving spouse should wait until he or she is no longer in shock to make financial decisions and understand their financial needs. 

Here are steps couples should take to prevent frozen accounts when faced with death or illness:

1.    Hire a financial planner who specializes in estate settlement and an accountant to file tax returns for state and/or federal estate tax returns. Establishing a financial advisor, that both spouses like and trust, can reduce these overwhelming decisions that one might need to make without an advisor. Each spouse should be confident and comfortable with this person.

2.    Make sure both spouses give the executor permission to manage digital assets. Enabling both spouses to have access to and control over assets will reduce potential problems in the situation of death or illness. Another way to ensure immediate access is by stating “transferable on death.” This may be done when the couple sets up the account. 

3.    Stay up to date with your online service software to track every account and asset. This will ensure secure accounts and assets. Assets that are jointly held or are held in the survivor’s name alone are protected, unless the survivor co-signed or guaranteed the debts.

Here are steps a surviving spouse should take when dealing with death or illness:

1.    Order multiple copies of the death certificate to use to reassign financial accounts and settle the estate. The death certificate will allow you to contact the spouse’s employer to ask about a 401(k), pension, stock options and life insurance, etc.  

2.    Contact the estate attorney, accountant and financial adviser. Update your will after shock has worn off. 

3.    Gather and rename household bills, bank, brokerage, insurance, and credit-card statements in your name alone. 

4.    Create a new financial plan after you have understood immediate expenses and are able to make long-term decisions. 

Credit given to:  Tergesen, A. (2019, March 29). Estate Planning for the Uninitiated. 

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We also welcome and appreciate anyone who wishes to write a Tax Tip of the Week for our consideration. We may be reached in our Dayton office at 937-436-3133 or in our Xenia office at 937-372-3504. Or, visit our website.  

This Week’s Author – Brianna Anello

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | Growing up to be Entrepreneurs July 31, 2019

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : General, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Tip, Taxes, Uncategorized , add a comment

While the majority of us will spend most of our careers working for someone else, having an entrepreneurial spirit or background can open up new possibilities and ways to approach everyday life. The following article was published in the Wall Street Journal on April 28, 2019 by Molly Baker.

                              -Brianna Anello

From the very beginning, Bob Burch has exposed his children to entrepreneurship. When his first daughter, Neely, was born, Bob Burch’s first instinct was to introduce Neely to the office. So, he brought her by to show her off on their way back from the hospital. This poses the famous question on whether entrepreneurs are born or made? Throughout the Burch family this can be seen in both aspects. Entrepreneurships started with Mr. Burch and his brother Chris. They are the founders of a successful retail clothing line, Tony Burch. 

Mr. Burch believes a crucial part of becoming an entrepreneur is nurturing a sense of entrepreneurship. Immersion started at an early age for the Burch children, from encouraging local lemonade sales to teaching them what you need to start a business, to going across the country to show his family potential business ventures. They believe that entrepreneurs should be independent, creative and persistent when wanting to start their own business. These experiences have taught the Burch family lessons that they will hold close to their heart for the rest of their lives. 

Today the three oldest children are travelling the same path as their father, in becoming successful entrepreneurs. Roby, Bob’s son, will never forget his dad’s words of wisdom, “I can’t teach you how to be a lawyer, and I can’t teach you how to be a doctor. I can teach you how to be in business for yourself and how to be good at it.” The Burch children believe their parents, Bob and Susan, never really had certain hopes and dreams for their careers. Bob and Susan wanted their children to think beyond what college they wanted to attend or what they wanted to be when they grew up. They encouraged their children to think big. The process to thinking big included engaging and debating at the dinner table over work ideas. Bob explains that there is no such thing as solo effort. This process is a team effort and will enable the children to release their creativity. At the table, the children also absorbed business lingo and the strategies that they may use one day.

Entrepreneurship is about having the “ready for anything” mindset. One example Bob recalls is the most memorable turnaround story. When he was launching his first fashion show, the first truckload of products arrived and the sweaters had sleeves three inches too short. At this time, he didn’t have the time or money to replace them. Bob and his brother were on their toes. They created a design where Oxford shirt sleeves were rolled over the misfit sweater. It allowed them to showcase their go-to fashion and created opportunity to be successful and avoid potential failure. Because of this fashion show the business earned $100 million in annual sales. 

All of these lessons have influenced the Burch children’s careers. In college, Chloe and Neely pursued online ventures separately. Since they have joined forces, their handbags line is in more than 140 retailers nationwide. Their experiences have even helped their younger brother Roby. Roby is currently trying to launch a premium outdoor lifestyle brand. Bob believes that working as a team has not only created a bond between them, but will lead them to a more fulfilling life.

Credit given to:  Baker, M. (2019, April 29). A Generation of Siblings, Raised to Be Entrepreneurs. 

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We also welcome and appreciate anyone who wishes to write a Tax Tip of the Week for our consideration. We may be reached in our Dayton office at 937-436-3133 or in our Xenia office at 937-372-3504. Or, visit our website.  

This Week’s Author – Brianna Anello

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | IRS Audit Rate Falls – Should You Relax? July 24, 2019

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : Business consulting, General, tax changes, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Tip, Taxes, Uncategorized , add a comment

I cringe every time the newspaper headlines read that the IRS audit rate is falling. My worries are that our clients may become lazy on their record keeping along with the retention of appropriate supporting business documentation (e.g. receipts, cancelled checks, deposits slips, paid bills, invoices, etc.). Thankfully, my fears have remained unfounded as the stakes are too high with the IRS to become complacent.

As a side note, many taxpayers fail to realize that if your record keeping is poor – the IRS simply won’t use your records. Instead, the IRS may consider all of your deposits as taxable income whether they were otherwise taxable or not. And, if no supporting documentation was retained then all of your expenses may be disallowed. Ouch!

On May 21, 2019, the WSJ ran an article authored by Richard Rubin, IRS’s Audit Rate Continues to Fall. This article below shares further insights on who is being audited and to what extent the IRS budget is being increased.  

                                                                    -Mark Bradstreet

WASHINGTON—The Internal Revenue Service audited just 0.59% of individual tax returns last year, marking the seventh consecutive annual decline as the tax agency copes with smaller budgets and fewer workers.

That total was down from 0.62% the year before and hit the lowest mark since 2002, according to data released Monday.

Audits of the highest-income households dropped sharply, to their lowest levels since the IRS began reporting that data in 2008. In fiscal 2018, the IRS audited 6.66% of returns of filers with more than $10 million in adjusted gross income, down from 14.52% in 2017. Among households with income between $1 million and $5 million, the audit rate dropped from 3.52% to 2.21%.

The IRS released the data as it is trying to persuade Congress to make long-run investments in the agency’s technology and enforcement staff. So far, however, key Republicans in Congress remain skeptical, and there are mixed signals about whether the government will reverse the steady decline in tax enforcement.

“I’m not averse to beefing up their budget a little bit but I want to see results,” said Sen. John Kennedy (R., La.), who heads the subcommittee that oversees the IRS budget. “I’ve got a lot of confidence in the new commissioner and in the new secretary, but I’m not into just throwing money at the wall because the bureaucracy says we need more.”

President Trump has proposed boosting the IRS’s budget by 1.5% for the fiscal year that starts Oct. 1, to $11.5 billion from $11.3 billion, including a down payment on improving the agency’s technology.

The administration also is proposing a $15 billion, decadelong increase in IRS enforcement funding, which the agency says would generate $47 billion in additional federal revenue. That net gain of more than $30 billion would come from enforcing existing laws.

The IRS has been shrinking steadily, partly because electronic filing has increased its efficiency. But many of the recent changes have stemmed from Republican spending cuts after they took control of the House in 2011 and after the IRS said in 2013 that it had improperly scrutinized some conservative nonprofit groups.

Adjusted for inflation, the 2019 IRS budget is smaller than in 2000 and is 19% below peak funding in 2010, according to the Government Accountability Office. The agency’s workforce declined 4% in 2018 and is now 21% below where it was eight years ago, and the number of examiners that performs audits shrunk 38% from 2010 to 2017, according to the agency’s inspector general. Those cuts came as Congress handed the IRS more responsibility to administer the Affordable Care Act and police offshore bank accounts.

Declining IRS resources contributed to the decline in audits but weren’t the only cause, said David Kautter, assistant Treasury secretary for tax policy, who was acting IRS commissioner for much of fiscal 2018.

“In this age of technology, it’s easier to identify areas of noncompliance,” he said Monday.

Democrats say the IRS budget cuts are disproportionately benefiting high-income households.

“Republicans in the Senate and the House have been very much geared towards a policy that has produced lots of poor people being audited and lots of well-off people basically getting off the hook,” said Sen. Ron Wyden (D., Ore.), the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee. “It takes more resources. There’s no way around it.”

Mr. Kennedy said he wants more details on the IRS modernization plans, pointing to the agency’s difficulties overhauling its technology.

Sen. James Lankford (R., Okla.) said he wants more updated information on the tax gap—the difference between taxes owed and taxes paid—which should be released in the coming months.

“We need to be able to see it and know what we actually could get a return on, from enforcement,” he said.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that an extra $20 billion spent on IRS enforcement could yield $55 billion over the next decade and more beyond that as audits generate revenue. Once the IRS completed staff training and computer upgrades, the government could get as much as $5.20 in additional revenue for every $1 spent, according to CBO.

The agency started 2,886 criminal investigations in 2018, down from 5,234 just five years earlier, according to the agency’s inspector general. The IRS criminal investigations unit had 26% fewer special agents than it did in 2012.

The IRS also has fewer employees working to collect taxes from people who already owe. Each collections officer generates about $2 million a year, which means the smaller IRS is leaving $3.3 billion a year on the table, just from collections, according to the agency’s inspector general.

Tax experts say the agency’s performance could be improved through better taxpayer service and a simpler tax system. So would rules that gave the IRS more information about sources of income—such as profits from cash businesses—that they lack now.

Taxpayers are extremely likely to comply with tax rules when the IRS independently has access to information about their finances. Wages reported on Form W-2 almost always show up on tax returns. When the IRS doesn’t have withholding payments or information, people are more likely to underreport their income.

“I don’t believe the solution is more agents, more audits and more intrusive government into taxpayers,” said Rep. Kevin Brady (R., Texas), the top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee. “I think it’s smarter audits.”

But the drops in enforcement and the IRS budget have run in tandem, and the nonpartisan estimates from CBO, GAO and the IRS inspector general say reversing the spending cuts would generate money.

“We’re just in never-never land here. The IRS has had its capacity to do its job attacked. There’s no other way to say it,” Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D., Ore.) said at a recent hearing. “They can’t keep pace with what they’re up against.”

Credit given to:  Richard Rubin. This article was written May 20, 2019. You can write to Richard Rubin at richard.rubin@wsj.com

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We also welcome and appreciate anyone who wishes to write a Tax Tip of the Week for our consideration. We may be reached in our Dayton office at 937-436-3133 or in our Xenia office at 937-372-3504. Or, visit our website.

This Week’s Author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | What May Be The Best Investment Ever? July 17, 2019

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : General, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Tip, Uncategorized , add a comment

Longer ago than I care to admit, a client gave me some sage advice that I have never been able to improve upon. His father had told him that the best investment you can ever make is in yourself. One reason being is that there is no other investment that you will have ever more control over. I have found this advice to be very profound and useful.

Ted Jenkin, co-CEO and founder of oXYGen Financial offers further thoughts on this topic as published in the WSJ on June 17, 2019.  

                                -Mark Bradstreet

Invest 2% of your income in you

When we think about investments, we often direct our attention to categories such as stocks, bonds and real estate. What we often don’t think about is our most valuable asset: our ability to earn an income and to make that income grow faster.

Almost 20 years ago, I met a successful business owner who gave me a simple lesson: Invest 2% of everything you earn annually back into your ability to grow your income.

What does this mean exactly? Investing in you is like diversifying your portfolio of investments. You might take a chance and invest in that side hustle you think could be a business. Take a training course or advanced education that could further your current career. Invest in a personal coach who could improve your business performance. It could mean investing in an exercise or nutrition program that could give you more stamina every day to accomplish more.

It’s the best advice I’ve ever received—and I do it every single year.

Credit given to:  Ted Jenkin, co-CEO and founder of oXYGen Financial

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We also welcome and appreciate anyone who wishes to write a Tax Tip of the Week for our consideration. We may be reached in our Dayton office at 937-436-3133 or in our Xenia office at 937-372-3504. Or, visit our website.  

This Week’s Author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | Are You Considering Early Retirement? Maybe You Should Reconsider… July 10, 2019

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : General, tax changes, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Preparation, Tax Tip, Taxes , add a comment

Effects of Early Retirement

While many people look forward to retirement, after years of hard work and dedication, most people do not think about the potential physical, emotional and cognitive issues arising from the cessation of their life filled with the routine of working every day. Research suggests that early retirement may even kill you. You may think: How can that be? How can working longer be better for your health?

Early retirement offers many positive benefits. People have more time to pursue other passions and interests that they may have been longing to try. This gives them time to step away from stressful work and the high demand of work. 

Early retirees do not consider their potential unhealthy behaviors. These include being uninvolved with others, being too sedentary, over eating, and consuming too much alcohol. These factors arise because the retirees no longer have the purpose to fulfill work duties. Life as they have known it is suddenly gone.  This can lead to depression, lack of engagement, or even death. According to Richard W. Johnson, work and the work environment creates intellectual stimulation, while retirement can accelerate cognitive decline. He explains that it is important to keep the brain stimulated. 

Another risk to retirement is the possibility of becoming socially isolated. Many people do not realize the impact that a work environment can have on a person. Colleagues are there to engage and support each other, which adds significant social fulfillment to one’s life. Research suggests that avoiding social isolation by working even part time or volunteering may give retirees a longer life. Social isolation can reduce life satisfaction and affect your physical and mental health. Johnson discovered that only one-third of Americans age 55 and older will actually participate in community groups or unpaid activities. Being involved in activities or even having a part time job can provide stimulation and social interaction similar to that experienced by those who are engaged in full-employment.

Retiring early also has a significant financial impact. Some believe that this is the biggest danger to retirement. Being financially secure is something that people worry about each day while in paid employment. How much time do people think about it when they are in actual retirement? At age 62, you are eligible to receive Social Security, however, it will only cover about 40% of your paycheck. Johnson suggests that workers who remain in their careers can save some of their additional earnings for retirement and will accumulate more Social Security in the long run. 

When you turn 62…

At age 62 everyone thinks about the possibility of retiring. It is like a light bulb that goes off to indicate that you should consider taking the long break you have earned. A study by Maria Fitzpatrick at Cornell University and Timothy Moore at the University of Melbourne shows that there is a correlation between an increase in mortality rates and retirement. It states the risk factors include smoking and lack of physical activity, which are downfalls to early retirement. Many people believe they should retire by a certain age or they feel the pressure to retire early, which is a psychological effect. Johnson explains that as a society we should be encouraging older workers to stay on the job. This can boost long term health, longevity and the emotional and physical strength of the brain. Older workers are protected from age discrimination by Federal law. By allowing older workers to work longer the companies can not only benefit from the skilled workers but will enable the workers to live a longer healthier life. 

Credit given to:  Johnson, R. W. (2019, April 22). The Case Against Early Retirement. 

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We also welcome and appreciate anyone who wishes to write a Tax Tip of the Week for our consideration. We may be reached in our Dayton office at 937-436-3133 or in our Xenia office at 937-372-3504. Or, visit our website.  

This Week’s Author – Brianna Anello

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | Retirees July 3, 2019

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : General, tax changes, Tax Preparation, Tax Tip, Taxes, Uncategorized , add a comment

Everywhere you turn whether it is your doctor’s office or the WSJ or wherever, we see thought-provoking, often mind-numbing articles on the pros and the cons of retiring. Well, the article that follows is one from the WSJ written by Cheryl Winokur Munk. She delves into some of the more commonly made errors made by retirees. We have noticed many of these errors made by our friends and neighbors but of course we would never commit any of them ourselves.

                               -Mark Bradstreet

There are almost as many paths to retirement as there are retirees. But when it comes to financial mistakes that can derail their retirement, familiar patterns often emerge. Many retirees tend to invest too conservatively, spend too much too soon, pay too much in taxes or fall for too-good-to-be-true investments.

Retirees could ensure their nest egg lasts longer by avoiding these common mistakes:

Mistake No. 1: Investing too conservatively

A number of retirees try to eliminate risk by stashing their savings in cash, certificates of deposit or municipal bonds of very short duration. Though taking a more conservative approach in retirement can be prudent, playing it too safe can severely limit retirees’ earning potential, increasing the chances they’ll run out of money.

“It’s important to build a portfolio that incorporates an appropriate mix of fixed income and equities based on their other assets—including Social Security and rental income—their spending requirements and their life expectancy,” says David Savir, chief executive of Element Pointe Advisors, a registered investment adviser in Miami. The average American man will live to age 76, and the average American woman to age 81, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Mr. Savir recommends retirees build a portfolio to match their spending habits and estimated life expectancy—taking into account the national averages as well as their own health and family history—and test it using forward-looking simulations. Those simulations should take into account bear-market scenarios and the chance that returns may be lower—and volatility higher—than historical norms. “This will help a client determine whether they need to spend less, invest slightly more aggressively, or both,” he says.

Mistake No. 2: Spending mishaps

Some retirees shell out significant sums of money early in their retirement, often to pay off debt or enjoy leisure activities they couldn’t do while working. The problem with spending so much in the beginning is that it can be detrimental to a retiree’s long-term financial security, says Tim Sullivan, chief executive of Strategic Wealth Advisors Group, a registered investment adviser in Shelby Township, Mich.

While eliminating debt can be a good thing, large cash outlays can harm retirees’ long-term financial security. It may make even less sense when a retiree’s investments are earning far more than the rate of interest on the debt, Mr. Sullivan says. And while it’s understandable to want to buy a second house, take a pricey European vacation or remodel a home, retirees need to map out the potential lasting effects such hefty spending can have on their finances, Mr. Sullivan says.

He tells of a client in his late 50s who enjoyed a $25,000 African safari so much that upon his return he immediately booked another $20,000 trip. These purchases put such a dent in his nest egg that he risked running out of money six years earlier than expected and had to follow a strict budget to try to minimize the damage, Mr. Sullivan says.

Of course, retirees have to find the right balance, because being too strict with their spending early in retirement can lead to significant regrets later on. Beyond that, there’s a risk for some retirees that by being so frugal they’ll leave so much behind when they die that they will be over the federal or state estate-tax exemption limit, says Alison Hutchinson, senior vice president of private wealth management at Brown Brothers Harriman. They could also end up leaving more to their heirs than they are comfortable with, she says.

Mistake No. 3: Underestimating expenses

Advisers say it’s typical for retirees to underestimate their expenses in retirement, particularly health-care and other periodic, rather than regular, expenses. These incremental expenses—if not built into the budget—can derail a retiree’s financial security, advisers say.

Leslie Thompson, managing principal at Spectrum Management Group, a registered investment adviser in Indianapolis, recommends that people approaching retirement keep track of their expenses for at least a year, ideally two or three, before they leave the workforce, so they have a baseline to work with. They should then make the necessary tweaks to account for expenses they will no longer have and new expenses they may incur during retirement. “A well-thought-out plan should be based upon actual spending needs and future desires, with contingencies for nonrecurring items such as car purchases, major home repairs and remodels, and rising health-care costs,” she says.

Financial support for adult children and grandchildren is another expense that many retirees will want to build into their budget. Many retirees are happy to assist on an as-needed basis, but, to their detriment, they don’t consider the aggregate annual cost, says Alicia Waltenberger, director of wealth planning strategies at TIAA. “A lot of times when they see that collective number, it is eye-opening,” she says.

Mistake No. 4: Creating unnecessary tax expenses

When retirees have both tax-sheltered and taxable accounts, they commonly withdraw exclusively from their taxable account at first. The danger is that growth within the tax-sheltered account could bump the retiree to a higher tax bracket once required minimum distributions kick in, says Paul Lightfoot, president of Optima Asset Management, a registered investment adviser in Dallas. This could also affect the retiree’s Medicare premiums, he says.

Mr. Lightfoot recommends retirees perform yearly assessments using different tax scenarios to determine how best to optimize their accounts. One option may be to take some withdrawals from their tax-deferred account before they turn 70½, provided this doesn’t push them to a higher tax bracket. They might also consider converting some of their taxable-account savings to a Roth IRA because of anticipated tax rates in the future. While there are taxable consequences in the year of conversion, there may be longer-term tax benefits in a conversion, he says.

Mistake No. 5: Falling for investment pitches that are too good to be true

Many retirees are easily swayed by the prospect of finding high-returning investments that have little to no risk, but chasing yield can easily derail the savings they’ve worked hard to build, advisers say. Some advisers are particularly skeptical of products like indexed annuities for retirees, because many people don’t understand the products and think they are getting something they are not.

Dennis Stearns, founder of Stearns Financial Group, a registered investment adviser in Greensboro, N.C., also cautions retirees to pay attention to the fees they pay for investment management. Generally, clients with $500,000 to $5 million in assets should pay in the range of 0.5% to 1% in adviser fees, and keep other custodial fees and ETF and mutual-fund fees low, he says. If they’re paying more for investment management, it might be advisable to rethink the relationship. “The fees can really eat into your retirement savings,” he says.

Credit Given to: Cheryl Winokur Munk. Ms. Winokur Munk is a writer in West Orange, N.J. She can be reached at reports@wsj.com.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We also welcome and appreciate anyone who wishes to write a Tax Tip of the Week for our consideration. We may be reached in our Dayton office at 937-436-3133 or in our Xenia office at 937-372-3504. Or, visit our website.  

This Week’s Author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | When The Questions Are The Answers June 26, 2019

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : Business consulting, General, tax changes, Tax Tip, Taxes, Uncategorized , add a comment

Let’s take a break from tax topics this week. Yes, even I sometimes get tired of talking about income taxes. So, the topic this week is about leadership. All of us lead someone. Of course, the most important person to lead is yourself. And, as the old saying goes, if you can’t lead yourself then how can you lead someone else?

True leaders don’t give out answers. Often, they don’t know the answers. But the good leader knows their staff has inside them the answers that they seek. Good questions from a good leader help reveal these answers.  

This is further explained along with some examples in the following WSJ article, To Be a Better Leader, Ask Better Questions written by Hal Gregersen. It was published on Tuesday, May 14, 2019.  

                               -Mark Bradstreet

It is often said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different outcome.

Well, the same can be said of questions: Keep asking the same kind of question, and it is insane to think you are going to get a different kind of answer.

If you want a dramatically better answer, the key is to ask a better question.

In that one simple statement I have found a career’s worth of research, teaching and advisory work. No one raises an objection when they hear it—who could argue with the value of brilliant reframing? But at the same time, that statement alone is rarely enough. Most people want to be handed the five paradigm-smashing questions to ask.

Unfortunately, that isn’t possible. But what is possible is creating the conditions where the right questions are more likely to bubble up. To that end, here are some clear, concrete, measurable steps that any boss—or anyone, for that matter—can take to come up with those paradigm-smashing questions we all seek.

1. Understand what kinds of questions spark creative thinking.

There are lots of questions you can ask. But only the best really knocks down barriers to creative thinking and channel energy down new, more productive pathways. A question that does has five traits. It reframes the problem. It intrigues the imagination. It invites others’ thinking. It opens up space for different answers. And it’s nonaggressive—not posed to embarrass, humiliate or assert power over the other party.

One CEO I know is aware that his position can get in the way of getting honest information that will challenge his view of things. Instead of coming at his managers with something like, “Competitor X beat us to the punch with that move—how did we let that happen?” he gets more useful input with questions like, “What are you wrestling with and how can I help?” He asks customers and supply-chain partners: “If you were in my shoes, what would you be doing differently than what you see us doing today?”

Think about how these questions change the whole equation. People don’t start off defensive. The problem isn’t already tightly framed. The questions are open-ended, and the answers can be imaginative—rather than telling the boss what he wants to hear.

If you want to turn this first point into a trackable activity, how about this: Start noting in a daily diary how many questions you’ve asked that meet the five criteria.

2. Create the habit of asking questions.

Many bosses simply aren’t used to asking questions; they’re used to giving answers. So, in the early stages of building your questioning capacity, it’s helpful to start by copying other people’s questions. It’s the equivalent of practicing your scales. Once you’ve got the scales down, you can start to improvise.

You could do worse than to follow the questions asked by management thinker Peter Drucker, who liked to jump-start strategic thinking by asking: “What changes have recently happened that don’t fit ‘what everyone knows’”?

Another example: A leader in a consumer packaged-goods company constantly asks: “What more can we do to delight the customer at the point of purchase? And what more to delight them at the point of consumption?”

Again, think about what that does. Sure, the CEO could constantly repeat that the company wants to satisfy consumers. But by asking this question, it builds the habit of thinking in questions. And that, in turn, leads to daily inquiry about matters large and small, and an organization that keeps pushing its competitive advantages forward.

3. Fuel that habit by making yourself generate new questions.

Don’t stop with that generic question set, no matter how well you think it covers the bases. It will become just another activity rut reinforcing today’s assumptions if you and others become too familiar with it. Your goal is to generate new and better questions, not to cap your questioning career at the level of playing flawless scales.

New Perspectives, New Solutions

If you or your team are stuck on a problem, stop and spend four minutes generating nothing but questions about it. As in brainstorming, go for high volume and do no editing in progress. This will often yield a new way to look at the challenge and at least one new idea to solve it. Here’s an example of a question burst:

Instead, every day, note something in your environment that is intriguing and possibly a signal of change in the air. Then, restrain yourself from issuing a comment on it—or if it’s your habit, a tweet—and instead take a moment to articulate the questions it raises.

Then share the most compelling of those questions with someone else. Engage with it for a minute. To some extent, this is doing “reps,” exercising your questioning muscles so they’ll be strong enough when the occasion demands. But it’s also more than that, because chances are it will actually be one of these many, seemingly small, questions that yields your next big breakthrough.

Let me offer a well-known example. Blake Mycoskie was in Argentina when by his account he noticed a lot of children running around barefoot. He didn’t need to ask why they didn’t have shoes—obviously they were poor—but here’s the question it brought him to: Is there a sustainable way to provide children with shoes without having to rely on donations? And thus, he launched the social enterprise Toms, with its famous “one-for-one” business model.

4. Respond with the power of the pause.

When someone comes to you with a problem, don’t immediately respond with an answer. This is harder than it sounds, because you have probably internalized a sense long ago that you’re the boss because you’re decisive and have good judgment—in other words, you have the best answers.

Instead, make it your habit to respond with a question—ideally one that reframes the problem, but at least one that draws out more of your colleague’s thoughts on the matter. I’m not talking about the cop-out rejoinder of, “Well, what do YOU think we should do?” Help the person think through how the decision should be made, with questions like: “What are we optimizing for?” “What’s the most important thing we have to achieve with whatever direction we take?” Or: “What makes this decision so hard? What problem felt like this in the past?”

The payoff here comes in two forms. You’re teaching the colleague the value of pausing to get the question right before rushing to the answer. And nine times out of 10, you’re going to wind up with a better answer than the one you would have blurted out with less deliberation.

5. Brainstorm for questions.

This is an idea that is so simple, and involves an exercise so fast, that it constantly surprises me how effective it is. Whenever you or your team is at an impasse, or there is a sense that some insight is eluding you regarding a problem or opportunity, just stop and spend four minutes generating nothing but questions about it. Don’t spend a second answering the questions, or explaining why you posed a certain one. As in brainstorming, go for high volume and do no editing in progress. See if you can generate at least 15-20.

Eighty percent of the time, I find, the exercise yields some new angle of attack on the problem, and it virtually always re-energizes people to go at it with renewed gusto.

Here’s an example from an innovation team in a consumer-goods company. Struggling to come up with a new concept to test, we tried one of those question bursts. It started with, “What if we launched a response to [a competitor’s product] and did it better?” But soon enough it arrived at, “Are we stuck on assuming a certain price range? What if a customer was willing to give us 10 times that—what could we deliver that would be that valuable to them?” Bingo—the team zeroed in on that question as having real juice in it, and started generating more exciting ideas.

6. Reward your questioners.

Finally, keep track of how you respond when someone in the room asks a question that challenges how you’ve been approaching a problem or feels like it threatens to derail a solution train already leaving the station.

I remember hearing from executives at one company that the boss always surprised his top team by being willing to hear out even the craziest ideas. When others in the room were shaking their heads and hastening to move along, he would be the one to say, “Wait, say more…” to find the part of that flight of fantasy that could work.

If there’s one constant theme here, it’s the idea that bosses should reconceive what their primary job is. They aren’t there to come up with today’s best answers, or even just to get their teams to come up with them. Their job is to build their organization’s capacity for constant innovation.

Their enterprise’s future—and their own career trajectory—depends on their resolve to ask better questions.

Credit given to By Hal Gregersen. Dr. Gregersen is executive director of the MIT Leadership Center, a senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management and author of “Questions Are the Answer.” He can be reached at reports@wsj.com.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We also welcome and appreciate anyone who wishes to write a Tax Tip of the Week for our consideration. We may be reached in our Dayton office at 937-436-3133 or in our Xenia office at 937-372-3504. Or, visit our website.  

This Week’s Author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | IRS Audits June 19, 2019

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : Business consulting, General, tax changes, Tax Tip, Taxes , add a comment

No one in their right mind would welcome an IRS audit. However, sometime during your life, you may expect to have an IRS audit of some sort, even if only a correspondence audit. Other types of IRS audits include what they call a field audit which occurs at your place of business and an office audit which occurs at the IRS office. From time to time, clients will mention to me that they don’t fear an audit because they have done nothing wrong and have all of the necessary substantiation. Even, in the best of cases, audits are no fun – they are ALWAYS a huge time suck for you and for your professional and, thusly, can be quite expensive.

A further note about correspondence audits – at least half of the tax notices you receive from the IRS are incorrect. Yet, too many taxpayers upon receiving a notice with a balance due simply send the IRS a check. Yes, the IRS loves people like that! Upon receipt of any IRS correspondence, please immediately relay it to your CPA for an appropriate review and response.

It is rare, but not entirely unheard of, for an IRS agent to appear at your home or place of business. If that were to happen and regardless of how friendly they appear your best response is typically very simple. Be polite and inform the agent your CPA will be handling the questions on your behalf. Then, give the agent the name and contact information of your CPA. Ask the agent nicely to call your CPA with any questions that they may have. The same is also true for the receipt of an IRS letter notifying you that your income tax returns are under audit. Get that letter to your accounting firm so they can handle the audit on your behalf. It is not in your best interest to speak to the IRS agent before, during or after the audit. That is the job of your professional.  

The below article written by Jane Hodges – HOW MUCH DO YOU KNOW ABOUT IRS AUDITS? was published in the WSJ on March 25, 2019. It provides further information on the IRS process.

                                          –    Mark Bradstreet

The Internal Revenue Service audits tax returns every year—striking fear in the hearts of many whose accidental or deliberate errors may have led them to underpay the U.S. Treasury.

While the prospect can be terrifying, very few returns are actually audited and many audits are resolved through correspondence. The volume of IRS audits has declined in recent years to 933,785 in 2017 from 1.56 million in 2011, according to IRS data. Some audits even result in a refund. Many, of course, result in tax liabilities.

Still, it never hurts to prepare taxes with care, save records and understand changing tax laws (or work with professionals who do) so your returns will be less likely to raise flags.

What follows is a quiz to help readers hone their smarts about IRS audits.

1. What does the IRS call an audit?

A) Audit
B) Examination
C) Tax year review
D) Tax interview

Answer: B. Audits are referred to as examinations, and a taxpayer being audited corresponds with or meets an “examiner” assigned to his or her case.

2. What percentage of returns were audited during 2017?

A) 0.5%
B) 1.5%
C) 3.8%
D) 6.2%

Answer: A. During fiscal 2017, the IRS audited 0.5% of the 196 million returns it received during the calendar year 2016. That was down from 0.7% the previous year.

3. How does the IRS choose which tax returns to audit?

A) It hires private investigators
B) It looks at tax returns associated with filers undergoing existing audits
C) Computer screening
D) It reviews those whose income has more than doubled in a 10-year period

Answer: B and C. The IRS looks at the company that audit subjects keep. “We may select your returns when they involve issues or transactions with other taxpayers, such as business partners or investors, whose returns were selected for audit,” it says in an FAQ about audits on an IRS website. It also uses random computer screening in which algorithms track “norms” for deductions and expenses relative to the filer’s income and other factors.

4. How does the IRS notify a person or business of an audit?

A) By letter
B) By phone
C) Through email
D) Via process server

Answer: A. The IRS typically notifies taxpayers of audits in letters citing what years are under examination and which deductions or aspects of the returns need verification, substantiation or discussion. Once the audit is under way, a representative may call, but the IRS doesn’t initiate audits over the telephone. If you get a call from someone claiming to represent the IRS and notifying you of an audit, it is likely a scam.

5. Where are audits conducted?

A) In an IRS office
B) At the taxpayer’s home or place of business
C) Via correspondence
D) At the office of an authorized representative (tax attorney, CPA, enrolled agent)

Answer: Any of the above, depending on the degree of the inquiry or where the taxpayer stores records or conducts business and other factors. The IRS generally makes the final determination.

6. What percentage of tax audits are conducted by correspondence?

A) 12.6%
B) 32.5%
C) 50.9%
D) 70.8%

Answer: D. During fiscal 2017, when the IRS examined tax returns for the prior year and before, some 70.8% of audits were conducted by correspondence.

7. How long does the IRS expect taxpayers to keep tax records?

A) Forever
B) Five years following the date a return is filed
C) Three years following the date a return is filed or two years from the date a tax is paid
D) Six years, or seven years if the taxpayer is writing off bad debt or worthless securities

Answer: C, and sometimes D. Generally, the IRS suggests taxpayers keep tax records for three years after filing a return or two years from the date they paid tax. In some circumstances, say, if you failed to report income, didn’t file a return, or were flagged for filing a fraudulent return, it’s advisable to keep records longer.

8. Which household income level experiences a 12.5% incidence of audits?

A) $125,000 or more
B) $200,000 or more
C) $250,000 or more
D) $1 million or more

Answer: D. According to Intuit, 1% of taxpayers earning $200,000 or less are audited. Beyond that, the more a taxpayer earns, the more likely an audit is. Some 4% of those earning more than $200,000 are audited, and 12.5% of those earning $1 million or more are audited.

9. When filing taxes, what form of filing is most error-prone, according to the IRS?

A) Electronic filing
B) Returns filed by mail
C) Returns filed from abroad
D) Returns that are filed after an extension request

Answer: B. According to IRS information provided to TurboTax, those who file a return by mail show a 21% incidence of errors, while those who file electronically show only a 0.5% incidence of errors. TurboTax does not cite a reason why online filers have less errors, but presumably online filing software runs math or does automatic calculations which could reduce math-related errors.

10. How far back does the IRS go when choosing returns to audit?

A) 2 years
B) 3 years
C) 6 years
D) 10 years

Answer: B and C. The IRS generally goes back no more than three years in choosing returns to audit, but if it finds a “substantial error,” the agency says it may go back as far as six years.

Credit Given to: By Jane Hodges. Ms. Hodges is a freelance writer in Seattle and has been audited. She can be reached at reports@wsj.com. This appeared in the March 25, 2019, print edition as ‘How Much Do You Know About IRS Audits?’

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We also welcome and appreciate anyone who wishes to write a Tax Tip of the Week for our consideration. We may be reached in our Dayton office at 937-436-3133 or in our Xenia office at 937-372-3504. Or, visit our website.  

This Week’s Author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.