jump to navigation

Tax Tip of the Week | No. 456 | Your Most Valuable Resource April 18, 2018

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : General, Tax Tip, Uncategorized , add a comment

Tax Tip of the Week | April 18, 2018 | No. 456 | Your Most Valuable Resource

Time is free, but it is priceless.  
You can’t own it.
But you use it.
You can’t keep it.
But you can use it.
Once you’ve lost it, you can never get it back.

-Harvey Mackay

Nothing on our planet is more valuable than our time.

The following was taken from a presentation made by Dave Sullivan. It involves a new way of strategic planning using a technique that we shall call:

Make or Break

Makes:

Where must we succeed?

Examples:

1.    Breaking down Company goals into individual goals
2.    Geographical expansion
3.    Expanding product lines

Day to day focus:

Examples:

1.    Safety
2.    Quality
3.    Inventory control
4.    On-time delivery
5.    Reduce rejects
6.    Improve efficiencies

Breaks:

Where we must prevent failure.

Examples:

1.    Owners must unify goals
2.    Product Research and Development

Note:  Owners should be spending their precious time and energy on the Make or Break situations. They should not be worried about the day to day focus. It should be taking care of itself with the right systems and processes (although not perfectly). Trust that you have the right people to do so; if not find them. Too often owners are spending time on the minutiae instead of the all important “Make or Break” issues. This is where the rubber meets the road.

Be a better leader every day.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We may be reached in Dayton at 937-436-3133 and in Xenia at 937-372-3504. Or visit our website.

This week’s author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | No. 455 | Historical Highlights of the IRS April 11, 2018

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : Uncategorized , add a comment

Tax Tip of the Week | April 11, 2018 | No. 455 | Historical Highlights of the IRS

Some interesting or not so interesting bullet points taken directly from the IRS website:

1862 – President Lincoln signed into law a revenue-raising measure to help pay for Civil War expenses. The measure created a Commissioner of Internal Revenue and the nation’s first income tax. It levied a 3 percent tax on incomes between $600 and $10,000 and a 5 percent tax on incomes of more than $10,000.

1867 – Heeding public opposition to the income tax, Congress cut the tax rate. From 1868 until 1913, 90 percent of all revenue came from taxes on liquor, beer, wine and tobacco.

1872 – Income tax repealed.

1894 – The Wilson Tariff Act revived the income tax and an income tax division within the Bureau of Internal Revenue was created.

1895 – Supreme Court ruled the new income tax unconstitutional on the grounds that it was a direct tax and not apportioned among the states on the basis of population. The income tax division was disbanded.

1909 – President Taft recommended Congress propose a constitutional amendment that would give the government the power to tax incomes without apportioning the burden among the states in line with population. Congress also levied a 1 percent tax on net corporate incomes of more than $5,000.

1913 – As the threat of war loomed, Wyoming became the 36th and last state needed to ratify the 16th Amendment. The amendment stated, “Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.” Later, Congress adopted a 1 percent tax on net personal income of more than $3,000 with a surtax of 6 percent on incomes of more than $500,000. It also repealed the 1909 corporate income tax. The first Form 1040 was introduced.

1918 – The Revenue Act of 1918 raised even greater sums for the World War I effort. It codified all existing tax laws and imposed a progressive income-tax rate structure of up to 77 percent.

1919 – The states ratified the 18th Amendment, barring the manufacture, sale or transport of intoxicating beverages. Congress passed the Volstead Act, which gave the Commissioner of Internal Revenue the primary responsibility for enforcement of Prohibition. Eleven years later, the Department of Justice assumed primary prohibition enforcement duties.

1931 – The IRS Intelligence Unit used an undercover agent to gather evidence against gangster Al Capone. Capone was convicted of tax evasion and sentenced to 11 years.

1933 – Prohibition repealed. IRS again assumed responsibility for alcohol taxation the following year and for administering the National Firearms Act. Later, tobacco tax enforcement was added.

1942 – The Revenue Act of 1942, hailed by President Roosevelt as “the greatest tax bill in American history,” passed Congress. It increased taxes and the number of Americans subject to the income tax. It also created deductions for medical and investment expenses.

1943 – Congress passed the Current Tax Payment Act, which required employers to withhold taxes from employees’ wages and remit them quarterly.

1944 – Congress passed the Individual Income Tax Act, which created the standard deductions on Form 1040.

1952 – President Truman proposed his Reorganization Plan No. 1, which replaced the patronage system at the IRS with a career civil service system. It also decentralized service to taxpayers and sought to restore public confidence in the agency.

1953 – President Eisenhower endorsed Truman’s reorganization plan and changed the name of the agency from the Bureau of Internal Revenue to the Internal Revenue Service.

1954 – The filing deadline for individual tax returns changed from March 15 to April 15.

1961 – The Computer Age began at IRS with the dedication of the National Computer Center at Martinsburg, W.Va.

1965 – IRS instituted its first toll-free telephone site.

1972 – The Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division separated from the IRS to become the independent Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

1974 – Congress passed the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act, which gave regulatory responsibilities for employee benefit plans to the IRS.

1986 – Limited electronic filing began. President Reagan signed the Tax Reform Act, the most significant piece of tax legislation in 30 years. It contained 300 provisions and took three years to implement. The Act codified the federal tax laws for the third time since the Revenue Act of 1918.

1992 – Taxpayers who owed money were allowed to file returns electronically.

1998 – Congress passed the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act, which expanded taxpayer rights and called for reorganizing the agency into four operating divisions aligned according to taxpayer needs.

2000 – IRS enacted reforms, ending its geographic-based structure and instituting four major operating divisions: Wage and Investment, Small Business/Self-Employed, Large and Mid-Size Business and Tax Exempt and Government Entities. It was the most sweeping change at the IRS since the 1953 reorganization.

2001 – IRS administered a mid-year tax refund program to provide advance payments of a tax rate reduction.

2003 – IRS administered another mid-year refund program, this time providing an advance payment of an increase in the Child Tax Credit. Electronic filing reached a new high – 52.9 million tax returns, more than 40 percent of all individual returns.

Page Last Reviewed or Updated: 06-Jul-2016 (by the IRS).

Maybe someday, the IRS will get around to updating their own website regarding their history to include the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Apparently, they don’t have a deadline like the ones imposed upon us. C’est la vie!

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated.  We may be reached in Dayton at 937-436-3133 and in Xenia at 937-372-3504.  Or visit our website.

This week’s author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | No. 454 | New Tax Law (TCJA) – How It Will Affect Alimony Payments April 4, 2018

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : General, tax changes, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Tip, Taxes , add a comment

Tax Tip of the Week | April 4, 2018 | No. 454 | New Tax Law (TCJA) – How It Will Affect Alimony Payments

These new changes take effect for divorces and legal separations after 2018.

Prior law:  Under the current rules, an individual who pays alimony can deduct the alimony or separate maintenance payments paid during the years as an “above the line” deduction. An “above-the-line” deduction is a deduction that a taxpayer need not itemize to deduct. These deductions are more valuable than an itemized deduction.

And, under current rules, alimony and separate maintenance payments are taxable to the recipient spouse.

Please note that the rules for “child support”—remain unchanged. Payers of child support don’t receive a taxable deduction. Recipients of child support don’t pay tax on those amounts.

New law:  A tax deduction for alimony no longer exists for the payor. Also, alimony is no longer taxable income to the recipient. So, for divorces and legal separations that are executed after 2018, the alimony-paying spouse will no longer be able to deduct these payments and the alimony-receiving spouse doesn’t include the payments in gross income.

Note: TCJA rules are not applicable to existing divorces and separations. It’s important to emphasize that the current rules continue to apply to already-existing divorces and separations, as well as divorces and separations that are executed before 2019.

Under a special rule, if taxpayers have an existing (pre-2019) divorce or separation decree, and that agreement is legally modified, then the new rules don’t apply to that modified decree, unless the new agreement expressly states that the TCJA rules are to apply. Situations may exist where applying the TCJA rules voluntarily is advantageous for the taxpayers.

If you wish to discuss the impact of these rules on your particular situation, please give us a call.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are very much appreciated. We may be reached in Dayton at 937-436-3133 and in Xenia at 937-372-3504. Or visit our website.

This week’s author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | No. 453 | How Are Social Security Benefits Taxed? March 28, 2018

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : General, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Tip, Taxes, Uncategorized , add a comment

Tax Tip of the Week | March 28, 2018 | No. 453 | How Are Social Security Benefits Taxed?

A portion of the net benefits you receive each year from Social Security (or equivalent railroad retirement) benefits may be taxable income. If you receive either of these you will receive a Form SSA-1099, Social Security Benefit Statement, or Form RRB-1099. How much of these benefits might be taxed will be explained below.

Your social security benefits are subject to federal income tax on a portion of your social security benefits only if the sum of the your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) plus 50 percent of the social security benefits you received exceeds the applicable base amount – (1) $32,000 if you are married filing jointly, (2) $0 if you are married filing separately and lived with your spouse, or (3) $25,000 in any other instance. If you are married and file a joint return, you and your spouse must combine your incomes and benefits to decide if any of your combined benefits are taxable.

If you have concluded that your social security benefits are taxable, then the amount you must include in your taxable income is generally equal to the lesser of (1) 50 percent of the social security benefits you received, or (2) 50 percent of the amount by which the sum of your MAGI and 50 percent of the social security benefits received exceeds your base amount, not to exceed 85% of your benefits. Rules may differ for lump-sum distributions of social security benefits; if you have returned your social security benefits and your repayments exceed the gross benefits you receive; or if you receive social security benefits, have taxable compensation, contribute to a traditional IRA, and are covered (or your spouse is covered) by an employer retirement plan. The social security benefits are includible in the gross income of the person having the legal right to receive these benefits.

Ohio along with 36 other states and the District of Columbia do not tax social security benefits which often are a major source of income for many retirees.

Note:  Your employer makes a contribution on your behalf to the Social Security Administration. You also make a contribution for yourself albeit nondeductible. Contributions for the employer and the employee are the same. This creates a scenario of where double taxation may occur since the employee contributions are post-tax but the resulting benefits may be taxable.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are very much appreciated. We may be reached in Dayton at 937-436-3133 and in Xenia at 937-372-3504. Or visit our website.

This week’s author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | No. 452 | New Tax Law – The Common Misconceptions (That Can Get You Into Big Trouble) March 21, 2018

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : tax changes, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Preparation, Tax Tip, Taxes, Uncategorized , add a comment

Tax Tip of the Week | March 21, 2018 | No. 452 | New Tax Law – The Common Misconceptions (That Can Get You Into Big Trouble)

Too often I am guilty of just reading the “headlines” and believing I have the whole story. If it were only that easy! If I had only read the “headlines” on this new tax law I would have been significantly mislead.

Some of my misconceptions follow:

MISCONCEPTION #1 – EVERYONE SAVES TAX DOLLARS UNDER THE NEW TAX LAW.

Not so. For a multitude of reasons, including the loss of personal exemptions and the ceiling on state and local income taxes, the new tax law will cost some taxpayers extra tax dollars. Some a significant amount!

MISCONCEPTION #2 – ALL BUSINESSES SHOULD BE A “C” CORPORATION.

We are led to believe that the new flat 21% tax rate for “C” Corporations is a silver bullet and will cause a mass exodus from S Corporations, LLCs, partnerships and sole proprietorships. That is not going to happen. Sure, the 21% “C” Corporation rate is well less than the 37% top bracket on individuals, but SO many other even more important considerations exist.

MISCONCEPTION #3 – No need for IRC Section 179 deductions any longer since both new AND used property now qualify for the IRC Section 168 (bonus depreciation) deduction.

Section 179 and Section 168 are not treated the same in many states. In many states, the Section 179 is a faster write-off than Section 168; therefore of a greater value.

Also, please note that Section 179 has never been allowed to create a net operating loss (NOL). Section 168 may do so. However, under the new tax law – NOLs may not be carried back, only forward. So don’t fall into the trap of believing you may “catch-up” on your equipment purchases, create a large NOL with Section 168 depreciation expense, and carry that loss back for a tax refund.

MISCONCEPTION #4 – THE PENALTY FOR NOT HAVING HEALTH INSURANCE HAS BEEN ELIMINATED FOR 2018.

It is true the health insurance penalty is gone, BUT not until 2019.

MISCONCEPTION #5 – ALL PASS-THROUGH ENTITIES AUTOMATICALLY RECEIVE A 20% DEDUCTION.

Many S Corporations, partnership, and LLCs will receive the 20% deduction. Some will not. The 20% deduction is not necessarily an all or nothing proposition. If a business qualifies (and not all do) the actual deduction, if any, is all formula driven.

MISCONCEPTION # 6 – BIG TAX INCREASES WILL RESULT FROM THE ELIMINATION OF MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES AS ITEMIZED DEDUCTIONS.

Very few people received any benefit from miscellaneous itemized deductions, anyway. You may have observed them as a part of your itemized deductions on Form A. However, they are often blocked from being deducted since they must exceed 2% of adjusted gross income.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are very much appreciated. We may be reached in Dayton at 937-436-3133 and in Xenia at 937-372-3504. Or visit our website.

This week’s author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | No. 451 | Tax Considerations of a Reverse Mortgage March 14, 2018

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : Deductions, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Tip, Taxes, Uncategorized , add a comment

Tax Tip of the Week | March 14, 2018 | No. 451 | Tax Considerations of a Reverse Mortgage

Definition – a reverse home mortgage is a loan. Although, not a conventional one. In the case of a reverse home mortgage, the lender pays you while you still live in your home and hold title. In general, your reverse mortgage becomes due along with the interest when you move, sell your home, reach the end of a pre-determined loan period, or pass away.

Since reverse mortgages constitute a loan advance, they are not considered taxable income. Most individuals use the cash basis method of accounting, so any loan interest accrued is not deductible until paid. Often, this is when the reverse home mortgage loan is paid in full.This interest deduction may be limited because a reverse mortgage loan is generally subject to the limit on home equity debt.

Prior law: Home equity debt is any debt (other than acquisition debt) secured by a home mortgage. The amount of deductible interest may only be on the debt that does not exceed your home’s fair market value, decreased by any acquisition debt. In addition, if you are not using your reverse mortgage loan proceeds to improve your home, the amount that you can treat as home equity debt may not exceed $100,000 or $50,000, if married filing separately. Any equity interest as the result of the loan being over these limits is typically treated as personal interest which is nondeductible. Some notable exceptions include interest from loan proceeds used for investment and/or business purposes.

New law:  Whether your home equity loan is considered acquisition indebtedness or home equity indebtedness may determine if this interest will continue to be deductible in 2018 and forward. However, further IRS guidance is necessary as to how the new tax law will be applied in the real world. Some tax professionals feel that all home equity interest will be disallowed while others take the position that home equity interest from acquisition indebtedness will continue to be eligible for a tax deduction in 2018. Stay tuned for further developments.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. As always, they are much appreciated. We may be reached in Dayton at 937-436-3133 and in Xenia at 937-372-3504. Or visit our website.

This week’s author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | No. 450 | Tax Basis of Inherited Property March 7, 2018

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : Deductions, General, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Tip, Taxes, Uncategorized , add a comment

Tax Tip of the Week | March 7, 2018 | No. 450 | Tax Basis of Inherited Property

Short of selling an asset or a property at a break even, you will have a gain or a loss. This gain or loss is calculated by subtracting your tax basis in the asset from the sales price. Often, determining the amount of the sales price is not that difficult. On the other hand, calculating your tax basis may be quite complex. Your tax basis has a direct impact on your gain or loss. Therefore, arriving at an accurate amount for your tax basis is crucial.

For property inherited from an individual who died before or after 2010, your tax basis is generally one of the below:

(1) The fair market value of the property as of the date of the deceased individual’s death.

(2) The fair market value of the property on the alternate valuation date if the estate chooses to use the alternate valuation method. Several factors play in making what may be a big decision.

(3) The value under the special-use valuation method for real property used in farming or a closely held business. Election of this method may have far reaching implications.

(4) If a federal estate tax return need not be filed, the property’s appraised value at the date of death for state inheritance purposes.

Note: If you received appreciated property from the deceased individual and you or your spouse originally gave the property to that individual within one year before the individual’s death, your basis in this property is the same as the deceased individual’s adjusted basis in the property immediately before his or her death, rather than its fair market value.

Generally, if you and the deceased owned the property as joint tenants with right of survivorship, your basis in the property is determined based on (1) the proportionate amount you contributed to the original purchase price, and (2) for depreciable property, the way you were allocated income from the property.

If spouses held an interest in property as either (1) tenants by the entirety, or (2) joint tenants with right of survivorship where the spouses were the only joint tenants, then the surviving spouse’s basis in the property is the cost of the survivor’s half of the property with certain adjustments. The cost must be reduced by any deductions allowed to the surviving spouse for depreciation and depletion. The reduced cost must then be increased by the survivor’s basis in the half inherited.

If you inherited the property from an individual who died in 2010, your basis in the property depends on whether the executor of the deceased individual’s estate made a so-called Section 1022 election. If the executor did not make a Code Sec. 1022 election, your basis in the inherited property is determined under the rules described above. If the executor did make a Section 1022 election, the basis of property you acquired from the deceased individual generally is determined under modified carryover basis rules and not under the rules described above. Generally, the recipient’s basis is the lesser of the decedent’s adjusted basis or the fair market value at the date of the decedent’s death, increased by any allocation of “Basis Increase” (with certain additional adjustments).

Finally, the basis of certain property acquired from a decedent may not exceed the value of that property as finally determined for federal estate tax purposes, or if not finally determined, the value of that property as reported on Form 8971, Information Regarding Beneficiaries Acquiring Property From a Decedent.

As you can see from above, there are many considerations in computing the basis of inherited property. Too often, the critical pieces of this puzzle are no longer available or require a visit to the courthouse at best to review old property and estate records. It is wise to never discard the estate paperwork of anyone from which you have inherited assets or expect to inherit assets. These may be very important to you many, many years down the road.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. They are all much appreciated. We may be reached in Dayton at 937-436-3133 and in Xenia at 937-372-3504. Or visit our website.

This week’s author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | No. 449 | New Tax Law (TCJA) Restricts Like-Kind Exchange Rules for Non-Real Estate Property (Ouch!) February 28, 2018

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : Deductions, General, tax changes, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Preparation, Tax Tip, Taxes , add a comment

Tax Tip of the Week | Feb 28, 2018 | No. 449 | New Tax Law (TCJA) Restricts Like-Kind Exchange Rules for Non-Real Estate Property (Ouch!)

In a like-kind exchange, a taxpayer generally does not recognize a taxable gain or loss on an exchange of like-kind properties provided both the relinquished property and the replacement property are held for productive use in a business or for investment purposes, and no cash(boot) is received in the exchange. For those exchanges completed after Dec. 31, 2017, the TCJA limits tax-free exchanges to exchanges of real property that is not held primarily for sale. Therefore, as previously allowed, exchanges of personal property and intangible property can no longer qualify as tax-free like-kind exchanges.

On the surface, you may think losing like-kind exchanges for personal and intangible property is not a big deal since we can instead use IRC Sections 168 and/or 179 to write-off the new or used equipment placed in service. This reasoning may be valid. BUT, what about those situations where some equipment or machinery is sold without buying a replacement? Under the new tax law, this scenario will cost you tax dollars since you most likely will have a gain on the sale. This is especially true if Sections 168 and/or 179 had been used on the asset sold.  In fact, the entire gain may all be taxable in the year of sale since your tax basis is zero.

Make your CPA aware of any significant asset sales during the year, especially the sale of any equipment or machinery for which a replacement won’t be purchased in the same tax year (of an equal or greater value). Otherwise, you may be in for an unpleasant surprise.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. We may be reached in Dayton at 937-436-3133 and in Xenia at 937-372-3504.  Or visit our website.

This week’s author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | No. 448 | Litigious Times for Farmers (and All Businesses) February 21, 2018

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : General, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Tip , add a comment

Tax Tip of the Week | Feb 21, 2018 | No. 448 | Litigious Times for Farmers (and All Businesses)

I am not an attorney. I am not an insurance agent. Much of the following content was derived from “Welcome to the Litigious Age” written by Chris Bennett in the Farm Journal (January, 2018 pages 26-27). His article is slanted towards farmers but many of the ideas and concepts also apply to other businesses and industries. His article discusses the need for having appropriate insurance coverage. And, yes – good insurance is generally considered as the first line of defense against litigation. At the end of this article, I will briefly discuss the use of various entities as another line of defense.

Physical injuries can occur on a farm. They can happen to practically anyone. The list of people that could come in harm’s way is long and includes neighbors, employees, subcontractors, workers, suppliers, relatives, friends, passersby, hunters, trespassers, sales reps, guests, customers (e.g. hayrides). Lawsuits may ensue as the result of an injury. Such lawsuits are capable of swallowing the farm’s assets. Too often, farmers and other business owners are viewed as being wealthy with significant assets or having deep pockets. Even if the claim is insured, the existing coverage may not be enough. In this situation, the farmer may be responsible for the shortfall. Often after paying a claim an insurance company may cancel the policy or increase future premiums. For an example, one farmer allowed a neighbor to ride a snowmobile across his property. The neighbor ran into a white gas storage tank.  Argument was “the farmer should have recognized the low-visibility of the tank and marked it.” The insurance company paid the claim. But, with increased premiums to the farmer the insurance company will eventually recover their losses.

Meeting with your insurance agent at least once a year makes a lot of sense. Much of your insurance policy is often difficult to understand. So many farms’ assets and various operations may require specific coverage that is not otherwise covered by a general liability policy. Find out from your agent what is covered and what is not. Do you have enough coverage to protect your assets?  Etc.

As promised earlier – I will briefly discuss some of the traits of various entity choices and their application to a conversation on insurance coverage and potential litigation. First, let me define an entity. An entity includes a person, partnership, LLC, trust, or corporation – each of which has a separately identifiable existence. Each entity choice may come with its own set of tax rules and other regulations. The best way to describe some of the benefits of entities is to mention the old adage of – don’t put all of your eggs in a one basket, because if you do then the possibility exists of losing all of your eggs in one painful moment. Use of various entities aside from only a personal one may provide you with an opportunity to have multiple baskets to divide up your eggs. So in the event of some unfortunate mishap you would not have all of your eggs in one basket. As always, please consult with your insurance agent, attorney and your CPA.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. We may be reached in Dayton at 937-436-3133 and in Xenia at 937-372-3504. Or visit our website.

This week’s author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.

Tax Tip of the Week | No. 447 | New Tax Law (TCJA) – Rules Significantly Eased for Code Section 168 & 179 February 14, 2018

Posted by bradstreetblogger in : Deductions, General, tax changes, Tax Planning Tips, Tax Preparation, Tax Tip, Taxes, Uncategorized , add a comment

Tax Tip of the Week | Feb 14, 2018 | No. 447 | New Tax Law (TCJA) – Rules Significantly Eased for Code Section 168 & 179

Good news for business owners!

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) has very favorably changed the tax rules for “accelerated” tax depreciation expense under IRC Sections 168 and 179.

Prior Law:  Section 168 (bonus depreciation) – taxpayers were allowed to deduct 50% of the cost of most new tangible property other than buildings (with a few exceptions). This “50% bonus depreciation” was scheduled to be reduced to 40% for property placed in service in calendar year 2018, 40% in 2019 and 0% in 2020 and thereafter.

New Law:  For property placed in service and acquired after Sept. 27, 2017, the TCJA has raised the 50% rate to 100%.

Also, perhaps, even more importantly, under the TCJA the post-Sept. 27, 2017 property eligible for bonus depreciation may be new or used.

Prior Law:  Section 179 expensing – taxpayers could elect to deduct the entire cost of Section 179 property up to an annual limit of $510,000. For qualifying assets placed in service in tax years that begin in 2018, the adjusted limit was $520,000. This annual limit was reduced by one dollar for every dollar that the cost of all Section 179 property placed in service during the tax year exceeded a $2,030,000 threshold. For those assets placed in service in tax years that begin in 2018, the threshold was to be $2,070,000.

New Law:  The TCJA ratcheted up the annual dollar limit for expensing to $1 million and $2,500,000 as the new phase down threshold.

The new definition of qualifying property has been expanded for both Sections 168 and 179. More favorable depreciation lives were also made available, meaning faster tax write-offs.

Vehicles.  The TCJA triples the annual dollar caps on depreciation (and the Code Sec. 179 vehicle expensing) of passenger automobiles and small vans and trucks. Also, because of the extension in bonus depreciation, the increase for vehicles allowed bonus depreciation of $8,000 in the other-wise-applicable first year cap is extended through 2026 (with no phase-down).

Farm property.  More good news!  For items placed in service after 2017, the TCJA reduces the depreciation period for most farm equipment from seven years to five. It also allows many types of farm property to be depreciated under the 200% (instead of 150%) declining balance method.

Thank you for all of your questions, comments and suggestions for future topics. We may be reached in Dayton at 937-436-3133 and in Xenia at 937-372-3504. Or visit our website.

This week’s author – Mark Bradstreet, CPA

–until next week.